Loading...

Working capital & credit · 7 min read
Many businesses have a sanctioned limit they can never actually draw in full, because of how drawing power is calculated. Here is why, and how to avoid the common traps.
A business can have a cash credit limit sanctioned at a healthy figure and still find itself unable to draw anywhere near that amount. This confuses a lot of borrowers, who assume the sanctioned limit is simply the amount available. It is not. What is actually available to draw at any point is the drawing power, a figure recalculated regularly from the value of the stock and receivables the account is secured against, and it can be well below the sanctioned limit if those underlying values have not been reported, or have fallen.
The sanctioned limit is the ceiling the bank has approved based on the business's assessed working capital need. Drawing power is the amount actually available to draw against that limit at a given point in time, calculated from the value of stock and receivables (less an agreed margin) that the business has pledged as security under a hypothecation arrangement. The two coincide only when the business is holding enough eligible stock and receivables, correctly reported, to fully support the sanctioned figure. In practice, drawing power moves up and down with the business's actual inventory and debtor position, while the sanctioned limit stays fixed until the next renewal.
| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| Start with eligible stock value | Raw material, WIP and finished goods, valued per the agreed basis (usually lower of cost or market) |
| Add eligible receivables | Debtors within the agreed age limit (e.g. up to 90 days), excluding related-party or disputed debtors |
| Subtract trade creditors | Sundry creditors for the same goods, per the sanction terms |
| Apply the margin | A percentage the business must fund itself, not borrow against |
| Result: drawing power | Compared against the sanctioned limit — the lower of the two is what can actually be drawn |
Drawing power is recalculated each time a fresh stock and book-debt statement is submitted, usually monthly. If the statement is not submitted, is submitted late, or understates stock and receivables, drawing power can fall sharply — even though the business's actual position may be perfectly healthy — simply because the bank has no current, reliable figure to calculate against. This is one of the most common, and most avoidable, reasons a business finds its usable limit suddenly reduced.
A late or inaccurate stock statement has real consequences
Beyond a reduced drawing power, irregular or inflated stock statements are exactly the kind of thing that draws closer scrutiny from the bank, and can affect the account's classification if the discrepancy is significant. Submit on time, and report honestly.
Not everything sitting in the warehouse or on the books counts toward drawing power. Obsolete or slow-moving stock, goods held on consignment for someone else, stock pledged elsewhere, and debtors past the agreed age limit or owed by related parties are typically excluded, per the terms of the sanction. A business that includes ineligible items in its stock statement, deliberately or by oversight, is overstating its own drawing power — which the bank's periodic inspection or audit is likely to catch, and which then has to be corrected, sometimes with the account temporarily restricted while it is sorted out.
A hardware distributor's monthly drawing power calculation
A building materials distributor holding stock worth a certain value, and eligible debtors within the agreed age limit worth a further amount, would have those two figures added together, sundry creditors for the same goods subtracted, and the agreed margin applied to the remainder to arrive at drawing power. If, in a given month, a large batch of debtors crossed the 90-day eligibility cut-off because a key customer paid late, the eligible debtor figure — and therefore the drawing power — would fall for that month even though the underlying sale was genuine, simply because of the ageing rule built into the sanction terms.
If the outstanding balance in the account exceeds the drawing power for an extended period, the account can start moving toward the early categories of account stress that Indian banks track — commonly referred to as SMA (special mention account) classifications, beginning at SMA-0 for very early, short-duration irregularity. This is a signal for the bank to engage with the borrower, not an automatic penalty, but it is far better addressed by keeping drawing power and utilisation aligned proactively than by responding after the classification has already triggered.
Treat the stock statement as a monthly discipline, not paperwork
Businesses that build stock statement preparation into their regular monthly accounting close, rather than as a last-minute task, almost always have cleaner drawing power calculations and fewer surprises.
Beyond the monthly statement, banks typically carry out periodic stock audits or inspections, either through their own officers or an appointed external agency, particularly for larger cash credit limits. These visits physically verify that the stock declared in the monthly statement genuinely exists, is stored where it is supposed to be, and is valued reasonably. A business that has been reporting accurately each month has little to worry about at this stage; a business that has been rounding up figures, or including ineligible stock to keep drawing power comfortable, is likely to have the gap surface at exactly this point, which is a far worse outcome than a temporarily reduced limit.
Preparing for a stock audit is mostly a matter of good housekeeping: keeping stock physically organised and easy to count, maintaining a clear and current stock register that ties back to the accounting records, and being able to explain any large or unusual movement in inventory since the last visit. Businesses that treat the stock audit as a routine, well-prepared event rather than an occasional scramble tend to come through it with no adverse observations at all.
A discrepancy found at audit is treated more seriously than one you disclose yourself
If you notice your own stock statement has overstated a figure, correct it in the next submission and flag it to your relationship manager. A self-corrected discrepancy is viewed very differently from one an auditor uncovers independently.
Businesses running multiple locations — a factory, a separate warehouse, and perhaps a retail counter — should also be clear, internally, about which location's stock is included in the statement submitted to any particular bank, especially where more than one lender or facility is involved. Double-counting the same stock across two separate statements, even unintentionally, is exactly the kind of inconsistency an inspection or audit is designed to catch.
Questions
Drawing power reflects the current value of eligible stock and receivables after the agreed margin, which is often lower than the sanctioned ceiling — the two only match when the business is holding enough eligible security to fully support the sanctioned amount.
Banks commonly treat drawing power as nil, or apply the previous month's figure conservatively, until a fresh statement is submitted — so utilisation above that reduced figure can create an irregularity even if your actual stock position is fine.
Only if the sanction terms specifically allow it and the necessary documentation (like a warehouse receipt or a no-lien letter) is in place — check your specific sanction letter rather than assuming.
No — it typically first moves through early SMA classifications, which are signals for engagement between borrower and bank, well before any account would be classified as a non-performing asset.
It is set in the sanction terms based on the bank's assessment of the stock and receivables' liquidity and risk, and varies by industry and lender — it is not a fixed, universal figure.
Questions
Related offerings
Keep reading
Share a few details and our team will follow up.