Loading...

Corporate finance · 7 min read
Business sales rarely fail at the negotiating table — they fail from skipped steps earlier in the process. Here is the roadmap in order.
Buying or selling a business — whether it is a full acquisition, a majority stake sale, or bringing in a strategic partner — is a process with a fairly predictable shape, even though every deal feels unique to the people inside it. Promoters who have never done this before tend to underestimate two things: how much of the work happens before any number is discussed, and how much a deal can change shape between the first conversation and the final signature. This roadmap sets out the stages in the order they usually happen, and where an advisor's work adds the most value.
A seller who has not organised financial statements, contracts, licences and cap tables before approaching buyers loses negotiating leverage the moment a buyer's team starts finding gaps. A buyer who has not defined what a good target looks like — sector, size, geography, the problem the acquisition should solve — ends up chasing whatever crosses their desk. Preparation on the sell side usually means a diagnostic review similar to IPO readiness work: audited financials, clean related-party arrangements, and a data room started early rather than assembled under deadline pressure.
Sellers typically approach the market through an advisor who can reach a wider, more relevant set of buyers — strategic acquirers, private equity, or other promoters looking to expand — without a public announcement that could unsettle staff, customers or lenders. Buyers screen inbound and sourced opportunities against strategic fit before spending real time, since detailed evaluation of even a modest number of targets consumes significant management attention.
Once there is mutual interest, the parties usually exchange a term sheet — a short, largely non-binding document setting out the proposed structure, an indicative valuation range, exclusivity period and key conditions. A term sheet is a statement of intent, not a commitment to close; it exists to establish enough alignment that both sides are comfortable investing in the cost of due diligence.
Treat the term sheet as a filter, not a finish line
A term sheet that is too vague on valuation basis, structure and conditions invites disagreement later. Push for specificity even at this early, non-binding stage — it saves far more time in due diligence than it costs now.
Due diligence is the buyer's structured investigation into the target's financial, legal, tax, operational and commercial position, usually run in parallel workstreams by different specialists. Financial due diligence checks whether reported earnings, working capital and tangible net worth are what they appear to be; legal due diligence checks contracts, litigation, licences and title to assets; tax due diligence checks for exposures that would transfer with the business. Sellers who have prepared a clean data room in stage one move through this stage materially faster than those who have not.
A seller's advisor typically coordinates the flow of information into the data room, manages the volume and pace of buyer queries so they do not overwhelm the promoter's own team, and flags emerging findings early enough that a response can be prepared calmly rather than reactively. A buyer's advisor helps prioritise which findings genuinely matter to price or structure and which are noise, since not every gap uncovered in diligence is significant enough to change the deal.
Valuation and structuring happen together, not in sequence — a lower headline valuation with cash upfront and a higher valuation with a large earn-out tied to future performance are genuinely different deals, not the same deal at different prices. Structuring choices include the split between a share sale and an asset sale, deferred consideration, earn-outs linked to post-completion performance, and how existing debt and guarantees are treated.
| Structure | Typical use |
|---|---|
| Full share sale | Clean exit for the seller; buyer takes on the whole entity, including its history |
| Asset sale | Buyer wants specific assets or contracts without inheriting past liabilities |
| Majority stake with promoter retained minority | Growth capital plus continuity of promoter involvement |
| Earn-out | Bridges a valuation gap by tying part of the price to future performance |
The term sheet's principles are converted into binding definitive agreements — a share purchase or business transfer agreement, shareholders' agreement where a stake is retained, and any transitional services or non-compete arrangements. Closing conditions (regulatory approvals, lender consents where debt is secured against the business, third-party consents on key contracts) are satisfied before funds and shares actually change hands.
A hypothetical two-plant components business
Picture a promoter-run auto components business with two plants considering a majority stake sale to fund a third plant. A structured process might surface, during due diligence, that one plant's land was on a long but unregistered lease. Rather than derailing the deal, this becomes a structuring point — a price adjustment, an indemnity, or a condition to regularise the lease before closing — precisely the kind of issue that is manageable when found early and expensive when it surfaces after signing.
Negotiation on a business sale rarely happens as one conversation about one number; it happens as a series of smaller trade-offs across price, structure, timing and risk allocation, each of which shifts the others. A seller who holds firm on price but gives ground on an earn-out structure, or a buyer who accepts a slightly higher upfront price in exchange for a shorter transition period, are both making the same kind of trade, and recognising these trade-offs as they arise — rather than treating every point as a separate battle — tends to produce a deal both sides can live with.
Deals that close cleanly on paper can still struggle in the months afterward if the transition was not planned. A departing promoter's continued involvement for an agreed handover period, clarity on which staff, customers and suppliers need to be formally informed and when, and a realistic view of which systems and processes will change under new ownership all belong in the definitive agreements or an accompanying transition plan, not left to be worked out informally after closing.
M&A advisory work covers preparation, sourcing, process management, valuation framing, negotiation support and coordination between the workstreams described above. It does not include acting as a stockbroker, merchant banker or law firm; legal drafting and opinions sit with qualified lawyers, and any listed-company aspects sit with SEBI-registered intermediaries.
Questions
Timelines vary widely by size and complexity, but a well-prepared process commonly runs to several months from first buyer conversations to closing; unprepared sellers often take considerably longer.
Most terms are non-binding statements of intent, though certain clauses — confidentiality, exclusivity, cost allocation — are usually drafted as binding even within an otherwise non-binding document.
A share sale transfers ownership of the company itself, including its history and liabilities; an asset sale transfers specific assets or contracts, letting the buyer be more selective about what it takes on.
It is not always a strict legal requirement, but buyers rely heavily on audited or at least reviewed financials during due diligence, and their absence usually depresses achievable valuation or slows the process.
It can help bridge a gap between what a seller believes the business is worth and what a buyer is willing to pay upfront, by tying part of the consideration to verified future performance rather than resolving the disagreement outright.
Related offerings
Keep reading
Share a few details and our team will follow up.